Greg Bales

Art & Infertility

In 2008, after two years of failing to make a child organically, we learned the doom Kathy had already been feeling for more than a year was justified: I was diagnosed with male-factor infertility. Our only real chance to move forward would be in vitro fertilization. We couldn’t afford it; we couldn’t afford not to do it. One way we tried to work through that diagnosis, our anger, and our options was to start a secret infertility blog, “Less Than a Million.” This post and what comments from 2008 that are attached to it come from that blog.—gb


Grant Wood, Fall Plowing

Laura Cummings reveals how art was her refuge during years of infertility, and in the process she exposes the fact that infertility itself is not much of a subject of art:

Fertility in art is generalised, if I may so generalise. It is an attribute in search of a body. It is a ripe bosom and child-bearing hips, or a healthy young nude with an inviting smile, or a woman in some frieze bearing a basket of apples or corn. It is plentiful Ceres, Roman goddess of harvest and motherly love (a concept, you notice, not a human being) or her Greek counterpart Demeter, scattering seeds, her name apparently meaning distribution-mother. It is, I am sorry to say, the figure made 25,000 years age by an anonymous man in Austria, who picked up a piece of limestone and carved it into a nude woman with outsize breasts and Zeppelin thighs (but no face of course), that posterity has laughably dubbed the Venus of Willendorf.

Fertility in art is availability plus abundance, with an optional lusty wink. It is, in short, total embarrassment. And an embarrassment not even restricted to the depiction of women, let it be freely said. Who, coming across it in the National Gallery, hasn’t squirmed in front of David Tenier’s rude personification of Spring as a gardener carrying an upright young tree in a pot before him: fertility as a huge comedy phallus.

And its opposite: infertility? No sight gags there; no sights at all. I can hardly summon even one image to mind. Barren land, seeds cast on stony ground, the empty vessel, the drought—Biblical metaphors, all, that speak irrefutably for themselves without need of further illustration.


What art is there that depicts infertility? Is it the sort that is collected in museums? Living atop Grant Wood’s fertile soil as I do, it is difficult to imagine art that is not in some way a celebration of new growth and future abundance. Desert paintings that I know are about the sublimity and drama, and even they are quick to recognize the resiliency of the landscape. Rudolph von Deutsch’s Penelope waiting for Ulysses is a scene of longing that gets at what infertility is like, but of course the story is not of an absent child, but of an absent husband. I think I will keep my eyes open.

Non sequitur: How far will the category puns stretch?

Comments

April 14, 2008

De-lurking to say that I enjoyed your post about Art and Infertility (as well as the rest of your blog). I read a post a month or so ago on the Stirrup Queens blog about this woman\'s artistic impression of infertility and it made sense to me: http://www.carmenmartinezjover.com/index02.html

Thanks for sharing your journey with us.
AO
Rockwall, TX
Thanks for the link, AOTexas. Jover\'s paintings are interesting; I think I need to mull the chair theme through (after work).
This fall I saw a Frida Kahlo exhibit at the Walker Art Center. Many of her paintings depict her struggles with miscarriage and infertility. That was the first time I had seen art that expressed that pain. It brought me to tears as it brought back memories of my own struggle. It was maybe the first time I felt a really strong and intimate connection to art.
Welcome too, Ann. And I did not know Kahlo; her marriage to Diego Rivera reads like Sartre & Simone de Beauvoir. But I see what you mean.

June 17, 2008

Hello everybody :)
I was very pleased to see your link to my page. I am an artist who struggled with infertility for 18 years...well 10 really...the first 10 years I couldn\'t believe it was happening to me I thought it was a matter of time.. I was a good person and thought that these things don\'t happen to good people. I was 22 when I got married and 39 when I had my last invitro. I painted my emotions...I painted them as chairs...why chairs? because all I wanted was another chair at my table...I wanted a family.

I always thought that ART meant ART and three years ago I saw a Congress in India on Infertility and ART so I wrote saying that I would love to give a speech explaining the emotions one goes through and how I thought that only in India they would combine ART with Infertility.....later...but only later...I learnt that ART meant Artificial REproductive Technology!!!!!! Doctors from all over the world where there...and that thought it was so funny how I could confuse ART with art :) :) :) Anyway since then I give lectures world wide and I share this human side to infertility. But I also believe we grow on the way. I have written 3 books, one is my autobiography where through my paintings I express this journey that those of use who have to walk along this painful path is so repetitive. What I learnt on this journey and I share it as a short cut to make it more pleasant for others. I then wrote two stories for children on how to share all these different ways of conceiving that exist now a days.

You mention Frida Kahlo, I have one specific painting which is compared with hers, its called \"Another treatment\" http://www.carmenmartinezjover.com/infertilidad/another.htm
Im a great fan of Frida Kahlo and if you are interested can tell you many things about her life and her suffering for wanting to have a child with Diego Rivera

I have also come out in a few videos I attach the link
http://hispanopolis.com/bin/english/segments.cgi?pid=5&sid=13

http://www.obgyn.net/display-av.asp?file=ASRM2006/ASRMMartinez&wm=1
REgards to all of you and a hug from Mexico
CArmen
Hello, Carmen! Thanks for stopping by and sharing some of your story. Your post reminded me that there is a Frida Kahlo exhibition in San Francisco now. The California Literary Review has a nice review of it.

Commenting is closed for this article.

Comments

The opportunity to comment on this post directly has passed. If you would still like to respond, send me an email.